In “Back to the Future 2″ we saw a look at the year 2015. How far are we REALLY away from that technology?
Question by Dopey Dinosaur: In “Back to the Future 2″ we saw a look at the year 2015. How far are we REALLY away from that technology?
Everyone remembers flying cars and hoverboards. How about the hydrator? Cell phones on neon video goggles? Self-drying clothes? Were the things in that movie pure fancy, or is 2015 simply too early to expect them? What are your thoughts?
Best answer:
Answer by billrussell42
flying cars and hoverboards are not possible or practical at this point. Can you imagine some of the idiots on the highways actually flying aircraft?
Self drying clothes? doesn’t seem very important, nor do the cell phones.
Remember it’s a movie!
.
Give your answer to this question below!
| Print article | This entry was posted by mosotech on August 2, 2010 at 12:55 pm, and is filed under Future Technology. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 1 year ago
Quite interesting I have thought about that a bit myself.
Holograms that jump out of a movie theater across the street and bite you are a LONG ways off, however that technology has progressed impressively.
Hover Converting OLD cars probably will not happen, WHEN/IF that happens they will probably be only on new models.
Dehydrated Pizzas going into a toaster oven type device and emerging fully hydrated is probably a stretch.
Thumb Print house keys are a reality, houses that change the lighting and such when you enter new rooms is possible.
The japanese/chinese owning a good portion of America is becoming more real every day.
Sleep guns such as what Doc uses on Jennifer is probably a stretch for the time being with out the use of drugs.
Weather control is FAR off.
Bats that extend could in theory be created.
Implants such as Griffs are a far ways off.
The court system becoming efficient is also probably never going to happen while lawyers make money of it’s inefficiencies.
Mr. Fusion, a consumer level fusion device is also probably a LONG ways off from happening.
Lots of things.
about 1 year ago
Some of the stuff is simply impossible to create at this time, might be another 80 years. But don’t you worry… I, personally, will invent shoes that lace themselves. I’ll also attempt the cell phones on neon video goggles. And maybe the self-drying clothes.
about 1 year ago
Flying cars have already been invented. However, they are very difficult to operate, difficult to mantain and hard to get into the air. One example was designed by the U.S. Air Force. It had 20 foot wings that folded back against the car and a propeller along with a regular gasoline engine. The car was just plain impracticle to produce, though and the concept was later cancelled. A few other people and companies have undertaken the concept as well but have also had limited results. There is one guy I read about in Popular Science or Popular Mechanics several years ago that created a practical flying car. It’s design was based on multiple propellors which altered direction and therefore thrust. In many ways it resembled Brittian’s Harrier jump jet in which jet thrust is diverted to give it a verticle take off and landing ability. The U.S. Marienes have been using them for some time and one is featured on Arnold Schwartzenager’s movie “True Lies.” In the very near future the Harriers in the U.S. and maybe Brittian will be replaced by the new F-35C Lightning II. It also has verticle take off and landing abilities but is also steathy and is being manufactured by an American company for use in the U.S. Marines, Air Force, Navy and probably by Brittian and other allied countries.
Ideally, in order to manufacture flying cars such as those on the Jetson’s, the best engine to use as a powersource is currently beyond mankind’s understanding of physics. That would be to build an engine that creates an antigravity force. So far it has been unproven that such a force even exists in nature. It’s currently believed that all matter has a natural tendency to attract other matter to it by use of sub-atomic particles called gravitrons. Minor physicists have theories that anti-gravitrons might also exist in nature or could be created. Think of it as magnatism. Magnets have plus and negative poles. If opposite poles come together, they attract each other like gravity does. If the same poles comes together, they repel each other. Unlike magnatism, all known gravity is an attractive force. Perhaps then anti-gravity would be an repelling force. If possible, then cars would not require wings to fly at all. A person would get into the vehicle, turn on the engine and slowly switch the engine from pulling to repulsing. In this manor the car would slowly lift off the ground uniformly. Then the car could generate pulling or gravitational fields in front of it and anti-gravitational forces to pull and push the car at the same time. However, all of this is theory and may never be practical. If it is practical, however, spacecraft could be generated in the same way. Depending on the strength and length of the fields generated, a spacecraft could travel much faster than they can with today’s technology. The only reported evidence it anit-gravity is by the sounds, speeds and motions imposed by UFO’s (alien aircraft, assuming they’re real). Many believable reports indicate that this air vessels generate very minimum levels of sound or none at all. Yet, they can cruise at high speeds and make 90 degree and even backward 45 degree angles on a dime. It’s been theorized by ufologists that this could be the result of anit-gravity devices. Certain movies have also shown vehicles of the future which seem to use this technology as well such as 5th Dimension with Bruce Willis.
As far as hoverboards go, they would be too hard and too dangerous to control. Even if it was possible to manufacture them, I doubt that their use would catch on that much.
As far as most of that technology goes, I think 2015 would be a bit early to expect them as you suggested.
Ed