DEVELOPING A FOUNDATION FOR THE BASIS & CERTAINTY OF THE PHILIPPINE TECHNOLOGY?

by Siemens PLM Software

Question by winston: DEVELOPING A FOUNDATION FOR THE BASIS & CERTAINTY OF THE PHILIPPINE TECHNOLOGY?
World’s objective in glorifying the theory of carbon emission reduction is wrong, obtained only from impressions gained through senses which turn out to be an illusion – not directly related or connected in constructively eradicating global warming & climate change in reality.

It is unfortunate that the world is unable to find & discover anything of value, essential to save man & earth. People became duller and dumber or totally blind. And the scientific community evaded and turned away from the basic sciences being taught in schools and therefore they betrayed the trust of the people for their concealment of true facts or, conversely, for their negligence in not giving the real facts. Moreover, it was also very disappointing that some Filipino people (in collaboration with politicians) tried to pirate the concept & modify the invention of the author Winston Kayanan but they were unsuccessful for they could not operate a portion as well as explain it. And no laws such as clean air act, ecological waste management act as well as other programs such as, among others, carbon trading, alternative energy, earth hour, plant forest, mitigation & adaptation including the Kyoto Protocol treaty can defeat the universal power & strength of the Philippine technology in curing the environment.

With God’s guidance, the author was able to envisage in a larger context of how global warming & climate change can be eliminated and how the environment can be repaired & rejuvenated. For every natural disaster that occurred, the author knew that the technology he made was very appropriate in total unison with nature. And he knew that he can plausibly explain the underlying cause & effect of each phenomenon while the scientific community could not up to this time. These include wildfires in California & Europe (always attributed to arson instead of the laser-effect of solar radiation); sudden death in France (a mystery instead of the temporary loss or shortage of O2); landslides in the Philippines (softening of the soil instead compression of CO2 under the soil); desertification (extreme activity of decay microorganisms, eating up organic matter of the soil); taller waves (sudden escape of high volume of CO2 gas after carbon sink); and, many more.

God’s reason for giving such powerful multi-purpose & multi-benefit technology thru the author is the physical plan of universally repairing & rejuvenating earth that is immediately necessary in accordance with the failures & faults of UNEP including FAO, WHO and WMO aside from other disciplines of ECOSOC’s agencies in terms of food shortages, water crisis, energy crisis, labor difficulties & problems, recession and many others. If God did not put a contingency, a temporary buffer in the forces of nature (specifically, carbon sink whereby its underlying purpose is to maintain &/or control the leverage of O2 and CO2 in the atmosphere), life on earth will stop to exist. And mankind will not anymore reach the 21st century because, without carbon sink, the ratio of O2 & CO2 will be perverted, causing simultaneous disasters of earthquakes, tornadoes, storms, wildfires, tsunamis, landslides, volcanic eruptions, pestilence, etc., which could have already destroyed organisms & earth in the 20th century or earlier.

We should thank God for placing such remedial force on nature. However, in philosophically analyzing this nature’s remedy, the author considers carbon sink as “putting dirt under the carpet” which is not a (permanent & autonomous) self-curing action of nature and therefore it should not be abused otherwise it will also kill life in the ocean (such as loss of O2, acidification, etc.) as primary consequence followed by the development of sea disasters, storm surges & others. At times, CO2 will also escape which can best be illustrated by the bubbling waters in France (i.e., the intermittent escape of CO2). Let this be known that the biological, chemical & physiological domicile of carbon is in dry lands and not in wetlands.

Best answer:

Answer by WhachooSay
If you are going to thank God, you may as well realize it’s all gonna end or stay the same based on what HE wants do alone. Invention or no invention.

Add your own answer in the comments!